{"id":12229,"date":"2016-07-13T09:00:24","date_gmt":"2016-07-13T16:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/?p=12229"},"modified":"2016-07-11T14:31:43","modified_gmt":"2016-07-11T21:31:43","slug":"to-see-or-not-to-see-over-the-moon-for-moonstruck","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/2016\/07\/13\/to-see-or-not-to-see-over-the-moon-for-moonstruck\/","title":{"rendered":"To See or Not to See<\/em>: Over the moon for Moonstruck<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Moonstruck
\n<\/i>4.5\/5<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve said it before, and I\u2019ll say it again: no other genre of film has more potential to be transcendental than the rom-com, which is why it\u2019s also so easy for rom-coms to go wildly and disastrously astray. Moonstruck <\/i>(1987) lands itself a spot among the transcendental; it\u2019s in the upper echelon of the romantic-comedy canon, capable of standing shoulder to shoulder with the great films of Woody Allen and Hall Ashby.<\/p>\n

Like Allen\u2019s and Ashby\u2019s work, Moonstruck<\/i> has a wonderfully brittle shell between its humour and its poignant observations; oftentimes what comes out as a joke lingers for the emotion it stirs inside us. The film melds together as many aspects of love as it can muster: humour, frustration, helplessness, betrayal, passion, love-struck (or moon-struck) abandon, a bit of magic, and luck.<\/p>\n

It deals with the young and the old, and it contrasts the youthful exuberance of Loretta (Cher) and Ronny (Nicolas Cage) with their parents and grandparents, who, in their own way, are each as exuberant as their kin.<\/p>\n

In fact, I was struck by the way the film portrays its old people as both refreshing and moving. The elderly characters aren\u2019t tossed off with a shrug as \u201cthe one that\u2019s dying,\u201d or \u201cthe one that\u2019s mean,\u201d or \u201cthe one that\u2019s wise\u201d\u2014they are all living for each day, as any character ought to be. Moonstruck<\/i> does not treat them as an emotional commodities but as virile human beings that want only to live and to love.<\/p>\n

This is not a film of realism, but because of that it\u2019s able to capture the surrealism of romantic (and familial) relationships. Aspects of human nature are exaggerated or omitted; circumstances are tampered with for comedic or emotional effect; it\u2019s because of these tweaks that we\u2019re able to experience the romantic-comedy formula anew.<\/p>\n

Moonstruck<\/i> is written very intelligently (John Patrick Shanley takes credit for the screenplay); even some of the corny lines stem from a person being carried away in their emotions rather than from the pen of an out-of-touch Hollywood hack.<\/p>\n

While there are elements of this film that haven\u2019t held up so well\u2014aspects of the plot would now seem a tad played out, and, fashion-wise, it is very much a film of 1987\u2014there are elements that will hold up forever.<\/p>\n

These elements make finding a good romantic comedy similar to finding love in one\u2019s own life: although you have to walk along a seemingly endless trail of flops, you end up finding gems that make every hardship endured more than worth it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Moonstruck 4.5\/5 I\u2019ve said it before, and I\u2019ll say it again: no other genre of film has more potential to be transcendental than the rom-com, which is why it\u2019s also so easy for rom-coms to go wildly and disastrously astray. Moonstruck (1987) lands itself a spot among the transcendental; it\u2019s in the upper echelon of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":12230,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,168],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns","category-july-13-2016"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12229"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12229\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12231,"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12229\/revisions\/12231"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12230"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nexusnewspaper.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}